It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there. You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.Īnd we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next.
We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. That's the Next New Thing.Īnd it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people.
RECENT EARTHQUAKES IN CALIFORNIA 2019 FREE
In " News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in-especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now. We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. I would be concerned for at least the next 12 months.Īnd that is your earthquake news for the day.īy signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from Mother Jones and our partners. But also along a longer fault that crosses some major highways. A 7.5 quake would be 0.4 Richter units larger than the Friday quake, roughly 4x larger in energy release. Although rock stresses are typically measured in kilobars, history tells us that 1-2 bars of additional stress can trigger the next quake. For the last few days the folks at the USGS have probably been estimating how many bars of stress have been gained or lost on the Garlock as a result of the quakes that SoCal experienced last week. The Garlock Fault lies at the lower right of the figure, trending WSW-ENE, and it produced a 7.5 quake in 1952. My worry is that both of these fault segments were not mapped before, and both lie close to a long fault that ruptured historically. The purple lines show all the previously mapped fault segments in the area. The longer set outlines the 7.1 earthquake.
The shorter set of aftershocks outlines the area of the 6.4 earthquake. Here’s a map of all the aftershocks from the two quakes: My geophysicist friend tells me that the two big Ridgecrest earthquakes last week happened along fault lines we didn’t even know existed.
0 kommentar(er)
